123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399400401402403404405406407408409410411412413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427428429430431432433434435436437438439440441442443444445446447448449450451452453454455456457458459460461462463464465466467468469470471472473474475476477478479480481482483484485486487488489490491492493494495496497498499500501502503504505506507508509510511512513514515516517518519520521522523524525526527528529530531532533534535536537538539540541542543544545546547548549550551552553554555556557558559560561562563564565566567568569570571572573574575576577578579580581582583584585586587588589590591592593594595596597598599600601602603604605606607608609610611612613614615616617618619620621622623624625626627628629630631632633634635636637638639640641642643644645646647648649650651652653654655656657658659660661662663664665666667668669670671672673674675676677678679680681682683684685686687688689690691692693694695696697698699 |
- Internet Engineering Task Force Greg Herlein
- Internet Draft Jean-Marc Valin
- draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt Simon Morlat
- March 3, 2004 Roger Hardiman
- Expires: September 3, 2004 Phil Kerr
- RTP Payload Format for the Speex Codec
- Status of this Memo
- This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance with
- all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026.
- Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
- Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that
- other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-
- Drafts.
- Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six
- months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other
- documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts
- as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in
- progress".
- The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
- http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt
- To view the list Internet-Draft Shadow Directories, see
- http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html.
- Copyright Notice
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
- Abstract
- Speex is an open-source voice codec suitable for use in Voice over
- IP (VoIP) type applications. This document describes the payload
- format for Speex generated bit streams within an RTP packet. Also
- included here are the necessary details for the use of Speex with
- the Session Description Protocol (SDP) and a preliminary method of
- using Speex within H.323 applications.
- 1. Conventions used in this document
- The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
- "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
- document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [5].
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 1]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- 2. Overview of the Speex Codec
- Speex is based on the CELP [12] encoding technique with support for
- either narrowband (nominal 8kHz), wideband (nominal 16kHz) or
- ultra-wideband (nominal 32kHz), and (non-optimal) rates up to 48 kHz
- sampling also available. The main characteristics can be summarized
- as follows:
- o Free software/open-source
- o Integration of wideband and narrowband in the same bit-stream
- o Wide range of bit-rates available
- o Dynamic bit-rate switching and variable bit-rate (VBR)
- o Voice Activity Detection (VAD, integrated with VBR)
- o Variable complexity
- 3. RTP payload format for Speex
- For RTP based transportation of Speex encoded audio the standard
- RTP header [2] is followed by one or more payload data blocks.
- An optional padding terminator may also be used.
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | RTP Header |
- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
- | one or more frames of Speex .... |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | one or more frames of Speex .... | padding |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- 3.1 RTP Header
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | timestamp |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
- | contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
- | ... |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- The RTP header begins with an octet of fields (V, P, X, and CC) to
- support specialized RTP uses (see [8] and [9] for details). For
- Speex the following values are used.
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 2]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- Version (V): 2 bits
- This field identifies the version of RTP. The version
- used by this specification is two (2).
- Padding (P): 1 bit
- If the padding bit is set, the packet contains one or more
- additional padding octets at the end which are not part of
- the payload. P is set if the total packet size is less than
- the MTU.
- Extension (X): 1 bit
- If the extension, X, bit is set, the fixed header MUST be
- followed by exactly one header extension, with a format defined
- in Section 5.3.1. of [8],
- CSRC count (CC): 4 bits
- The CSRC count contains the number of CSRC identifiers.
- Marker (M): 1 bit
- The M bit indicates if the packet contains comfort noise. This
- field is used in conjunction with the cng SDP attribute and is
- detailed further in section 5 below. In normal usage this bit
- is set if the packet contains comfort noise.
- Payload Type (PT): 7 bits
- An RTP profile for a class of applications is expected to assign
- a payload type for this format, or a dynamically allocated
- payload type SHOULD be chosen which designates the payload as
- Speex.
- Sequence number: 16 bits
- The sequence number increments by one for each RTP data packet
- sent, and may be used by the receiver to detect packet loss and
- to restore packet sequence. This field is detailed further in
- [2].
- Timestamp: 32 bits
- A timestamp representing the sampling time of the first sample of
- the first Speex packet in the RTP packet. The clock frequency
- MUST be set to the sample rate of the encoded audio data.
- Speex uses 20 msec frames and a variable sampling rate clock.
- The RTP timestamp MUST be in units of 1/X of a second where X
- is the sample rate used. Speex uses a nominal 8kHz sampling rate
- for narrowband use, a nominal 16kHz sampling rate for wideband use,
- and a nominal 32kHz sampling rate for ultra-wideband use.
- SSRC/CSRC identifiers:
- These two fields, 32 bits each with one SSRC field and a maximum
- of 16 CSRC fields, are as defined in [2].
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 3]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- 3.2 Speex payload
- For the purposes of packetizing the bit stream in RTP, it is only
- necessary to consider the sequence of bits as output by the Speex
- encoder [11], and present the same sequence to the decoder. The
- payload format described here maintains this sequence.
- A typical Speex frame, encoded at the maximum bitrate, is approx.
- 110 octets and the total number of Speex frames SHOULD be kept
- less than the path MTU to prevent fragmentation. Speex frames MUST
- NOT be fragmented across multiple RTP packets,
- An RTP packet MAY contain Speex frames of the same bit rate or of
- varying bit rates, since the bit-rate for a frame is conveyed in
- band with the signal.
- The encoding and decoding algorithm can change the bit rate at any
- 20 msec frame boundary, with the bit rate change notification provided
- in-band with the bit stream. Each frame contains both "mode"
- (narrowband, wideband or ultra-wideband) and "sub-mode" (bit-rate)
- information in the bit stream. No out-of-band notification is
- required for the decoder to process changes in the bit rate sent
- by the encoder.
- It is RECOMMENDED that values of 8000, 16000 and 32000 be used
- for normal internet telephony applications, though the sample
- rate is supported at rates as low as 6000 Hz and as high as
- 48 kHz.
- The RTP payload MUST be padded to provide an integer number of
- octets as the payload length. These padding bits are LSB aligned
- in network byte order and consist of a 0 followed by all ones
- (until the end of the octet). This padding is only required for
- the last frame in the packet, and only to ensure the packet
- contents ends on an octet boundary.
- 3.2.1 Example Speex packet
- In the example below we have a single Speex frame with 5 bits
- of padding to ensure the packet size falls on an octet boundary.
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | timestamp |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 4]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
- | contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
- | ... |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | ..speex data.. |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | ..speex data.. |0 1 1 1 1|
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- 3.4 Multiple Speex frames in a RTP packet
- Below is an example of two Speex frames contained within one RTP
- packet. The Speex frame length in this example fall on an octet
- boundary so there is no padding.
- Speex codecs [11] are able to detect the the bitrate from the
- payload and are responsible for detecting the 20 msec boundaries
- between each frame.
- 0 1 2 3
- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- |V=2|P|X| CC |M| PT | sequence number |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | timestamp |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | synchronization source (SSRC) identifier |
- +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
- | contributing source (CSRC) identifiers |
- | ... |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | ..speex data.. |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | ..speex data.. | ..speex data.. |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- | ..speex data.. |
- +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
- 4. MIME registration of Speex
- Full definition of the MIME type for Speex will be part of the Ogg
- Vorbis MIME type definition application [10].
- MIME media type name: audio
- MIME subtype: speex
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 5]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- Optional parameters:
- Required parameters: to be included in the Ogg MIME specification.
- Encoding considerations:
- Security Considerations:
- See Section 6 of RFC 3047.
- Interoperability considerations: none
- Published specification:
- Applications which use this media type:
- Additional information: none
- Person & email address to contact for further information:
- Greg Herlein <gherlein@herlein.com>
- Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca>
- Intended usage: COMMON
- Author/Change controller:
- Author: Greg Herlein <gherlein@herlein.com>
- Change controller: Greg Herlein <gherlein@herlein.com>
- This transport type signifies that the content is to be interpreted
- according to this document if the contents are transmitted over RTP.
- Should this transport type appear over a lossless streaming protocol
- such as TCP, the content encapsulation should be interpreted as an
- Ogg Stream in accordance with RFC 3534, with the exception that the
- content of the Ogg Stream may be assumed to be Speex audio and
- Speex audio only.
- 5. SDP usage of Speex
- When conveying information by SDP [4], the encoding name MUST be
- set to "speex". An example of the media representation in SDP for
- offering a single channel of Speex at 8000 samples per second might
- be:
- m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
- a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
- Note that the RTP payload type code of 97 is defined in this media
- definition to be 'mapped' to the speex codec at an 8kHz sampling
- frequency using the 'a=rtpmap' line. Any number from 96 to 127
- could have been chosen (the allowed range for dynamic types).
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 6]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- The value of the sampling frequency is typically 8000 for narrow band
- operation, 16000 for wide band operation, and 32000 for ultra-wide
- band operation.
- If for some reason the offerer has bandwidth limitations, the client
- may use the "b=" header, as explained in SDP [4]. The following example
- illustrates the case where the offerer cannot receive more than
- 10 kbit/s.
- m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
- b=AS:10
- a=rtmap:97 speex/8000
- In this case, if the remote part agrees, it should configure its
- Speex encoder so that it does not use modes that produce more than
- 10 kbit/s. Note that the "b=" constraint also applies on all
- payload types that may be proposed in the media line ("m=").
- An other way to make recommendations to the remote Speex encoder
- is to use its specific parameters via the a=fmtp: directive. The
- following parameters are defined for use in this way:
- ptime: duration of each packet in milliseconds.
- sr: actual sample rate in Hz.
- ebw: encoding bandwidth - either 'narrow' or 'wide' or
- 'ultra' (corresponds to nominal 8000, 16000, and
- 32000 Hz sampling rates).
- vbr: variable bit rate - either 'on' 'off' or 'vad'
- (defaults to off). If on, variable bit rate is
- enabled. If off, disabled. If set to 'vad' then
- constant bit rate is used but silence will be encoded
- with special short frames to indicate a lack of voice
- for that period.
- cng: comfort noise generation - either 'on' or 'off'. If
- off then silence frames will be silent; if 'on' then
- those frames will be filled with comfort noise.
- mode: Speex encoding mode. Can be {1,2,3,4,5,6,any}
- defaults to 3 in narrowband, 6 in wide and ultra-wide.
- penh: use of perceptual enhancement. 1 indicates
- to the decoder that perceptual enhancement is recommended,
- 0 indicates that it is not. Defaults to on (1).
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 7]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- Examples:
- m=audio 8008 RTP/AVP 97
- a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
- a=fmtp:97 mode=4
- This examples illustrate an offerer that wishes to receive
- a Speex stream at 8000Hz, but only using speex mode 3.
-
- The offerer may suggest to the remote decoder to activate
- its perceptual enhancement filter like this:
-
- m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
- a=rtmap:97 speex/8000
- a=fmtp:97 penh=1
-
- Several Speex specific parameters can be given in a single
- a=fmtp line provided that they are separated by a semi-colon:
-
- a=fmtp:97 mode=any;penh=1
- The offerer may indicate that it wishes to send variable bit rate
- frames with comfort noise:
- m=audio 8088 RTP/AVP 97
- a=rtmap:97 speex/8000
- a=fmtp:97 vbr=on;cng=on
- The "ptime" attribute is used to denote the packetization
- interval (ie, how many milliseconds of audio is encoded in a
- single RTP packet). Since Speex uses 20 msec frames, ptime values
- of multiples of 20 denote multiple Speex frames per packet.
- Values of ptime which are not multiples of 20 MUST be ignored
- and clients MUST use the default value of 20 instead.
-
- In the example below the ptime value is set to 40, indicating that
- there are 2 frames in each packet.
-
- m=audio 8008 RTP/AVP 97
- a=rtpmap:97 speex/8000
- a=ptime:40
-
- Note that the ptime parameter applies to all payloads listed
- in the media line and is not used as part of an a=fmtp directive.
- Values of ptime not multiple of 20 msec are meaningless, so the
- receiver of such ptime values MUST ignore them. If during the
- life of an RTP session the ptime value changes, when there are
- multiple Speex frames for example, the SDP value must also reflect
- the new value.
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 8]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- Care must be taken when setting the value of ptime so that the
- RTP packet size does not exceed the path MTU.
- 6. ITU H.323/H.245 Use of Speex
- Application is underway to make Speex a standard ITU codec.
- However, until that is finalized, Speex MAY be used in H.323 [6] by
- using a non-standard codec block definition in the H.245 [7] codec
- capability negotiations.
- 6.1 NonStandardMessage format
- For Speex use in H.245 [7] based systems, the fields in the
- NonStandardMessage should be:
- t35CountryCode = Hex: B5
- t35Extension = Hex: 00
- manufacturerCode = Hex: 0026
- [Length of the Binary Sequence (8 bit number)]
- [Binary Sequence consisting of an ASCII string, no NULL terminator]
- The binary sequence is an ascii string merely for ease of use.
- The string is not null terminated. The format of this string is
- speex [optional variables]
-
- The optional variables are identical to those used for the SDP
- a=fmtp strings discussed in section 5 above. The string is built
- to be all on one line, each key-value pair separated by a
- semi-colon. The optional variables MAY be omitted, which causes
- the default values to be assumed. They are:
- ebw=narrow;mode=3;vbr=off;cng=off;ptime=20;sr=8000;penh=no;
- The fifth byte of the block is the length of the binary sequence.
- NOTE: this method can result in the advertising of a large number
- of Speex 'codecs' based on the number of variables possible. For
- most VoIP applications, use of the default binary sequence of
- 'speex' is RECOMMENDED to be used in addition to all other options.
- This maximizes the chances that two H.323 based applications that
- support Speex can find a mutual codec.
- 6.2 RTP Payload Types
- Dynamic payload type codes MUST be negotiated 'out-of-band'
- for the assignment of a dynamic payload type from the
- range of 96-127. H.323 applications MUST use the H.245
- H2250LogicalChannelParameters encoding to accomplish this.
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 9]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- 7. Security Considerations
- RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification
- are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP
- specification [2], and any appropriate RTP profile. This implies
- that confidentiality of the media streams is achieved by encryption.
- Because the data compression used with this payload format is applied
- end-to-end, encryption may be performed after compression so there is
- no conflict between the two operations.
- A potential denial-of-service threat exists for data encodings using
- compression techniques that have non-uniform receiver-end
- computational load. The attacker can inject pathological datagrams
- into the stream which are complex to decode and cause the receiver to
- be overloaded. However, this encoding does not exhibit any
- significant non-uniformity.
- As with any IP-based protocol, in some circumstances a receiver may
- be overloaded simply by the receipt of too many packets, either
- desired or undesired. Network-layer authentication may be used to
- discard packets from undesired sources, but the processing cost of
- the authentication itself may be too high.
- 8. Normative References
- 1. Bradner, S., "The Internet Standards Process -- Revision 3", BCP
- 9, RFC 2026, October 1996.
- 2. Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R. and V. Jacobson, "RTP:
- A Transport Protocol for real-time applications", RFC 1889,
- January 1996.
- 3. Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail
- Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies",
- RFC 2045, November 1996.
- 4. Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description
- Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998.
- 5. Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement
- Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
- 6. ITU-T Recommendation H.323. "Packet-based Multimedia
- Communications Systems," 1998.
- 7. ITU-T Recommendation H.245 (1998), "Control of communications
- between Visual Telephone Systems and Terminal Equipment".
- 8. RTP: A transport protocol for real-time applications. Work
- in progress, draft-ietf-avt-rtp-new-12.txt.
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 10]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- 9. RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal
- Control. Work in progress, draft-ietf-avt-profile-new-13.txt.
- 10. L. Walleij, "The application/ogg Media Type", RFC 3534, May
- 2003.
- 8.1 Informative References
- 11. Speexenc/speexdec, reference command-line encoder/decoder,
- Speex website, http://www.speex.org/
-
- 12. CELP, U.S. Federal Standard 1016. National Technical
- Information Service (NTIS) website, http://www.ntis.gov/
- 9. Acknowledgments
- The authors would like to thank Equivalence Pty Ltd of Australia
- for their assistance in attempting to standardize the use of Speex
- in H.323 applications, and for implementing Speex in their open
- source OpenH323 stack. The authors would also like to thank Brian
- C. Wiles <brian@streamcomm.com> of StreamComm for his assistance in
- developing the proposed standard for Speex use in H.323
- applications.
- The authors would also like to thank the following members of the
- Speex and AVT communities for their input: Ross Finlayson,
- Federico Montesino Pouzols, Henning Schulzrinne, Magnus Westerlund.
- 10. Author's Address
- Greg Herlein <gherlein@herlein.com>
- 2034 Filbert Street
- San Francisco, CA
- United States 94123
-
- Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@hermes.usherb.ca>
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
- University of Sherbrooke
- 2500 blvd UniversitüÃüüÃé
- Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1K 2R1
- Simon MORLAT <simon.morlat@linphone.org>
- 35, av de Vizille App 42
- 38000 GRENOBLE
- FRANCE
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 11]
- ^L
- Internet-Draft draft-herlein-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt March 3, 2004
- Roger Hardiman <roger@freebsd.org>
- 49 Nettleton Road
- Cheltenham
- Gloucestershire
- GL51 6NR
- England
- Phil Kerr <philkerr@elec.gla.ac.uk>
- Centre for Music Technology
- University of Glasgow
- Glasgow
- G12 8LT
- Scotland
- 10. Full Copyright Statement
- Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
- This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
- others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
- or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
- and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
- kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
- included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
- document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
- the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
- Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
- developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
- copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
- followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
- English.
- The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
- revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
- This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
- "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
- TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
- BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
- HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
- MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- Acknowledgement
- Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
- Internet Society.
- Herlein, Valin, et. al. Expires September 3, 2004 [Page 12]
- ^L
|