123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200201202203204205206207208209210211212213214215216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305306307308309310311312313314315316317318319320321322323324325326327328329330331332333334335336337338339340341342343344345346347348349350351352353354355356357358359360361362363364365366367368369370371372373374375376377378379380381382383384385386387388389390391392393394395396397398399 |
- <HTML>
- <HEAD><TITLE>APR Design Document</TITLE></HEAD>
- <BODY>
- <h1>Design of APR</h1>
- <p>The Apache Portable Run-time libraries have been designed to provide a common
- interface to low level routines across any platform. The original goal of APR
- was to combine all code in Apache to one common code base. This is not the
- correct approach however, so the goal of APR has changed. There are places
- where common code is not a good thing. For example, how to map requests
- to either threads or processes should be platform specific. APR's place
- is now to combine any code that can be safely combined without sacrificing
- performance.</p>
- <p>To this end we have created a set of operations that are required for cross
- platform development. There may be other types that are desired and those
- will be implemented in the future.</p>
- <p>This document will discuss the structure of APR, and how best to contribute
- code to the effort.</p>
- <h2>APR On Windows and Netware</h2>
- <p>APR on Windows and Netware is different from APR on all other systems,
- because those platforms don't use autoconf. On Unix, fspr_private.h (private to
- APR) and apr.h (public, used by applications that use APR) are generated by
- autoconf from acconfig.h and apr.h.in respectively. On Windows (and Netware),
- fspr_private.h and apr.h are created from fspr_private.hw (fspr_private.hwn)
- and apr.hw (apr.hwn) respectively.</p>
- <p> <strong>
- If you add code to acconfig.h or tests to configure.in or aclocal.m4,
- please give some thought to whether or not Windows and Netware need
- these additions as well. A general rule of thumb, is that if it is
- a feature macro, such as APR_HAS_THREADS, Windows and Netware need it.
- In other words, if the definition is going to be used in a public APR
- header file, such as fspr_general.h, Windows needs it.
-
- The only time it is safe to add a macro or test without also adding
- the macro to apr*.h[n]w, is if the macro tells APR how to build. For
- example, a test for a header file does not need to be added to Windows.
- </strong></p>
- <h2>APR Features</h2>
- <p>One of the goals of APR is to provide a common set of features across all
- platforms. This is an admirable goal, it is also not realistic. We cannot
- expect to be able to implement ALL features on ALL platforms. So we are
- going to do the next best thing. Provide a common interface to ALL APR
- features on MOST platforms.</p>
- <p>APR developers should create FEATURE MACROS for any feature that is not
- available on ALL platforms. This should be a simple definition which has
- the form:</p>
- <code>APR_HAS_FEATURE</code>
- <p>This macro should evaluate to true if APR has this feature on this platform.
- For example, Linux and Windows have mmap'ed files, and APR is providing an
- interface for mmapp'ing a file. On both Linux and Windows, APR_HAS_MMAP
- should evaluate to one, and the ap_mmap_* functions should map files into
- memory and return the appropriate status codes.</p>
- <p>If your OS of choice does not have mmap'ed files, APR_HAS_MMAP should
- evaluate to zero, and all ap_mmap_* functions should not be defined. The
- second step is a precaution that will allow us to break at compile time if a
- programmer tries to use unsupported functions.</p>
- <h2>APR types</h2>
- <p>The base types in APR</p>
- <ul>
- <li>dso<br>
- Shared library routines
- <li>mmap<br>
- Memory-mapped files
- <li>poll<br>
- Polling I/O
- <li>time<br>
- Time
- <li>user<br>
- Users and groups
- <li>locks<br>
- Process and thread locks (critical sections)
- <li>shmem<br>
- Shared memory
- <li>file_io<br>
- File I/O, including pipes
- <li>atomic<br>
- Atomic integer operations
- <li>strings<br>
- String handling routines
- <li>memory<br>
- Pool-based memory allocation
- <li>passwd<br>
- Reading passwords from the terminal
- <li>tables<br>
- Tables and hashes
- <li>network_io<br>
- Network I/O
- <li>threadproc<br>
- Threads and processes
- <li>misc<br>
- Any APR type which doesn't have any other place to belong. This
- should be used sparingly.
- <li>support<br>
- Functions meant to be used across multiple APR types. This area
- is for internal functions only. If a function is exposed, it should
- not be put here.
- </ul>
- <h2>Directory Structure</h2>
- <p>Each type has a base directory. Inside this base directory, are
- subdirectories, which contain the actual code. These subdirectories are named
- after the platforms the are compiled on. Unix is also used as a common
- directory. If the code you are writing is POSIX based, you should look at the
- code in the unix directory. A good rule of thumb, is that if more than half
- your code needs to be ifdef'ed out, and the structures required for your code
- are substantively different from the POSIX code, you should create a new
- directory.</p>
- <p>Currently, the APR code is written for Unix, BeOS, Windows, and OS/2. An
- example of the directory structure is the file I/O directory:</p>
- <pre>
- apr
- |
- -> file_io
- |
- -> unix The Unix and common base code
- |
- -> win32 The Windows code
- |
- -> os2 The OS/2 code
- </pre>
- <p>Obviously, BeOS does not have a directory. This is because BeOS is currently
- using the Unix directory for it's file_io.</p>
- <p>There are a few special top level directories. These are test and include.
- Test is a directory which stores all test programs. It is expected
- that if a new type is developed, there will also be a new test program, to
- help people port this new type to different platforms. A small document
- describing how to create new tests that integrate with the test suite can be
- found in the test/ directory. Include is a directory which stores all
- required APR header files for external use.</p>
- <h2>Creating an APR Type</h2>
- <p>The current design of APR requires that most APR types be incomplete.
- It is not possible to write flexible portable code if programs can access
- the internals of APR types. This is because different platforms are
- likely to define different native types. There are only two execptions to
- this rule:</p>
- <ul>
- <li>The first exception to this rule is if the type can only reasonably be
- implemented one way. For example, time is a complete type because there
- is only one reasonable time implementation.
- <li>The second exception to the incomplete type rule can be found in
- fspr_portable.h. This file defines the native types for each platform.
- Using these types, it is possible to extract native types for any APR type.</p>
- </ul>
- <p>For this reason, each platform defines a structure in their own directories.
- Those structures are then typedef'ed in an external header file. For example
- in file_io/unix/fileio.h:</p>
- <pre>
- struct ap_file_t {
- fspr_pool_t *cntxt;
- int filedes;
- FILE *filehand;
- ...
- }
- </pre>
- <p>In include/fspr_file_io.h:</p>
- </pre>
- typedef struct ap_file_t ap_file_t;
- </pre>
- <p> This will cause a compiler error if somebody tries to access the filedes
- field in this structure. Windows does not have a filedes field, so obviously,
- it is important that programs not be able to access these.</p>
- <p>You may notice the fspr_pool_t field. Most APR types have this field. This
- type is used to allocate memory within APR. Because every APR type has a pool,
- any APR function can allocate memory if it needs to. This is very important
- and it is one of the reasons that APR works. If you create a new type, you
- must add a pool to it. If you do not, then all functions that operate on that
- type will need a pool argument.</p>
- <h2>New Function</h2>
- <p>When creating a new function, please try to adhere to these rules.</p>
- <ul>
- <li> Result arguments should be the first arguments.
- <li> If a function needs a pool, it should be the last argument.
- <li> These rules are flexible, especially if it makes the code easier
- to understand because it mimics a standard function.
- </ul>
- <h2>Documentation</h2>
- <p>Whenever a new function is added to APR, it MUST be documented. New
- functions will not be committed unless there are docs to go along with them.
- The documentation should be a comment block above the function in the header
- file.</p>
- <p>The format for the comment block is:</p>
- <pre>
- /**
- * Brief description of the function
- * @param parma_1_name explanation
- * @param parma_2_name explanation
- * @param parma_n_name explanation
- * @tip Any extra information people should know.
- * @deffunc function prototype if required
- */
- </pre>
- <p>For an actual example, look at any file in the include directory. The
- reason the docs are in the header files is to ensure that the docs always
- reflect the current code. If you change paramters or return values for a
- function, please be sure to update the documentation.</p>
- <h2>APR Error reporting</h2>
- <p>Most APR functions should return an ap_status_t type. The only time an
- APR function does not return an ap_status_t is if it absolutely CAN NOT
- fail. Examples of this would be filling out an array when you know you are
- not beyond the array's range. If it cannot fail on your platform, but it
- could conceivably fail on another platform, it should return an ap_status_t.
- Unless you are sure, return an ap_status_t.</p>
- <strong>
- This includes functions that return TRUE/FALSE values. How that
- is handled is discussed below
- </strong>
- <p>All platforms return errno values unchanged. Each platform can also have
- one system error type, which can be returned after an offset is added.
- There are five types of error values in APR, each with it's own offset.</p>
- <!-- This should be turned into a table, but I am lazy today -->
- <pre>
- Name Purpose
- 0) This is 0 for all platforms and isn't really defined
- anywhere, but it is the offset for errno values.
- (This has no name because it isn't actually defined,
- but for completeness we are discussing it here).
- 1) APR_OS_START_ERROR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
- APR errors start to be defined. Error values are
- defined as anything which caused the APR function to
- fail. APR errors in this range should be named
- APR_E* (i.e. APR_ENOSOCKET)
- 2) APR_OS_START_STATUS This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
- APR status values start. Status values do not indicate
- success or failure, and should be returned if
- APR_SUCCESS does not make sense. APR status codes in
- this range should be name APR_* (i.e. APR_DETACH)
- 4) APR_OS_START_USEERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
- APR apps can begin to add their own error codes.
- 3) APR_OS_START_SYSERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
- system error values begin.
- </pre>
- <strong>The difference in naming between APR_OS_START_ERROR and
- APR_OS_START_STATUS mentioned above allows programmers to easily determine if
- the error code indicates an error condition or a status codition.</strong>
- <p>If your function has multiple return codes that all indicate success, but
- with different results, or if your function can only return PASS/FAIL, you
- should still return an fspr_status_t. In the first case, define one
- APR status code for each return value, an example of this is
- <code>fspr_proc_wait</code>, which can only return APR_CHILDDONE,
- APR_CHILDNOTDONE, or an error code. In the second case, please return
- APR_SUCCESS for PASS, and define a new APR status code for failure, an
- example of this is <code>fspr_compare_users</code>, which can only return
- APR_SUCCESS, APR_EMISMATCH, or an error code.</p>
- <p>All of these definitions can be found in fspr_errno.h for all platforms. When
- an error occurs in an APR function, the function must return an error code.
- If the error occurred in a system call and that system call uses errno to
- report an error, then the code is returned unchanged. For example: </p>
- <pre>
- if (open(fname, oflags, 0777) < 0)
- return errno;
- </pre>
- <p>The next place an error can occur is a system call that uses some error value
- other than the primary error value on a platform. This can also be handled
- by APR applications. For example:</p>
- <pre>
- if (CreateFile(fname, oflags, sharemod, NULL,
- createflags, attributes, 0) == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE
- return (GetLAstError() + APR_OS_START_SYSERR);
- </pre>
- <p>These two examples implement the same function for two different platforms.
- Obviously even if the underlying problem is the same on both platforms, this
- will result in two different error codes being returned. This is OKAY, and
- is correct for APR. APR relies on the fact that most of the time an error
- occurs, the program logs the error and continues, it does not try to
- programatically solve the problem. This does not mean we have not provided
- support for programmatically solving the problem, it just isn't the default
- case. We'll get to how this problem is solved in a little while.</p>
- <p>If the error occurs in an APR function but it is not due to a system call,
- but it is actually an APR error or just a status code from APR, then the
- appropriate code should be returned. These codes are defined in fspr_errno.h
- and should be self explanatory.</p>
- <p>No APR code should ever return a code between APR_OS_START_USEERR and
- APR_OS_START_SYSERR, those codes are reserved for APR applications.</p>
- <p>To programmatically correct an error in a running application, the error
- codes need to be consistent across platforms. This should make sense. APR
- has provided macros to test for status code equivalency. For example, to
- determine if the code that you received from the APR function means EOF, you
- would use the macro APR_STATUS_IS_EOF().</p>
- <p>Why did APR take this approach? There are two ways to deal with error
- codes portably.</p>
- <ol type=1>
- <li> Return the same error code across all platforms.
- <li> Return platform specific error codes and convert them when necessary.
- </ol>
- <p>The problem with option number one is that it takes time to convert error
- codes to a common code, and most of the time programs want to just output
- an error string. If we convert all errors to a common subset, we have four
- steps to output an error string:</p>
- <p>The seocnd problem with option 1, is that it is a lossy conversion. For
- example, Windows and OS/2 have a couple hundred error codes, but POSIX errno
- only defines about 50 errno values. This means that if we convert to a
- canonical error value immediately, there is no way for the programmer to
- get the actual system error.</p>
- <pre>
- make syscall that fails
- convert to common error code step 1
- return common error code
- check for success
- call error output function step 2
- convert back to system error step 3
- output error string step 4
- </pre>
- <p>By keeping the errors platform specific, we can output error strings in two
- steps.</p>
- <pre>
- make syscall that fails
- return error code
- check for success
- call error output function step 1
- output error string step 2
- </pre>
- <p>Less often, programs change their execution based on what error was returned.
- This is no more expensive using option 2 than it is using option 1, but we
- put the onus of converting the error code on the programmer themselves.
- For example, using option 1:</p>
- <pre>
- make syscall that fails
- convert to common error code
- return common error code
- decide execution based on common error code
- </pre>
- <p>Using option 2:</p>
-
- <pre>
- make syscall that fails
- return error code
- convert to common error code (using ap_canonical_error)
- decide execution based on common error code
- </pre>
- <p>Finally, there is one more operation on error codes. You can get a string
- that explains in human readable form what has happened. To do this using
- APR, call ap_strerror().</p>
|